Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
E

Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Abuse Allegations

Dunedin, Florida Survey Completed on 10-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to thoroughly investigate two separate allegations of abuse involving two residents. In the first case, a resident with a history of trauma and PTSD reported that a male CNA was sexually inappropriate during incontinence care. The resident expressed discomfort with male caregivers and described feeling violated during the incident. Although the incident was reported to law enforcement, DCF, and the abuse hotline, the facility's documentation of the investigation was incomplete. There was a lack of documented staff interviews for those present during the alleged incident, and the facility did not have documentation of the roommate's statement specific to the event. Additionally, the care plan was not updated to reflect the resident's request for only female caregivers, and there was no documentation of skin assessments in the investigation file, despite claims that they were performed. In the second case, another resident with a history of trauma and psychiatric diagnoses reported that a staff member made an inappropriate personal comment regarding reproductive health. The facility's investigation documentation was insufficient, with only one undated staff witness statement provided and no documentation of interviews with other staff or residents. The facility did not complete or document skin sweeps as part of the investigation, despite indicating in their FEDREP information that such checks were conducted. The DON confirmed that weekly skin checks are expected but are not always documented in the context of abuse investigations. The facility's policy requires that statements be taken from the victim, the accused, and all possible witnesses, as well as securing physical evidence and preparing a detailed report upon completion of the investigation. However, in both cases, the facility did not follow its own policy, as evidenced by missing documentation of interviews, incomplete investigation files, and lack of thoroughness in addressing the allegations. These deficiencies were identified through interviews and record reviews conducted by surveyors.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙