Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Complete Wander Assessment and Implement Wander Guard Orders for High-Risk Resident

Bristol, Connecticut Survey Completed on 09-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately complete a wander risk assessment and to ensure appropriate interventions and orders were in place for a resident with a known history of wandering and elopement risk. The resident, who had diagnoses including vascular dementia and anxiety disorder, was initially assessed as high risk for wandering prior to a hospital transfer. Upon readmission, the wander risk assessment was incomplete, with key sections left blank, resulting in an inaccurately low risk score. According to the facility's own assessment directions, the missing sections should have been completed and would have indicated a high risk for wandering. Additionally, after the resident's transfer to the hospital, all previous physician orders, including those for the use of a wander guard and checks for its placement and function, were discontinued. Upon readmission, although the care plan identified the resident as an elopement risk and included interventions such as the use of a wander guard, there was no documentation that a new physician order for the wander guard was obtained or that checks for placement and function were ordered or documented. The DON confirmed that the assessment was incomplete and that staff should have entered new orders for the wander guard but could not provide documentation that this was done. Facility policy required that residents identified as high risk for wandering have a wander guard applied, but the lack of a complete assessment and missing physician orders meant that this intervention was not properly implemented or documented. The deficiency was identified through review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, which confirmed the failures in assessment completion, order initiation, and adherence to the plan of care for a resident at risk for wandering.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙