Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0553
D

Failure to Include Resident and Representative in Care Plan Development

Shelton, Connecticut Survey Completed on 09-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the inclusion of a resident and/or their representative in the development and implementation of a person-centered care plan. Clinical record review showed that a resident with schizophrenia and depression, who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on personal care, was admitted with a designated responsible party holding Power of Attorney. The care plan directed family involvement, but there was no documentation of any interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings from admission through several months, despite facility policy requiring such meetings within specific timeframes. The facility was unable to provide evidence that an admission care plan meeting or any subsequent meetings occurred as required. A social services note eventually documented a telephone care plan meeting with the responsible party, and a later IDT care plan meeting document failed to clarify if the resident or their representative were present or invited. Interviews with staff confirmed that required care plan meetings had not been conducted as per policy, and they could not explain the omission. Facility policy explicitly required inviting the resident and/or family to all care plan conferences and developing the care plan collaboratively, but this was not followed in the resident's case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙