Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
E

Failure to Prevent Recurrence of Nonconsensual Sexual Contact Between Residents

South Gate, California Survey Completed on 11-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to prevent the recurrence of nonconsensual sexual contact between two residents with severe cognitive impairment. After an initial incident in which one resident kissed another and attempted to climb into the other's bed, the facility did not conduct an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting or create a care plan with interventions to address the incident. Both residents' records lacked documentation of consent for a relationship, and their care plans were not updated to include interventions to prevent further incidents or monitor their interactions and locations. Subsequently, a second incident occurred in which a staff member observed one resident placing his hand on the other's upper thigh in a common area, again without staff supervision. The staff member did not immediately intervene, instead leaving the area to notify another staff member, which allowed the inappropriate contact to continue. Interviews with staff and review of records confirmed that neither resident had the capacity to consent to sexual activity, and that the facility's policies regarding abuse prevention and response were not followed after the initial incident. Family members of both residents were notified of the incidents and expressed that they did not consent to their relatives having sexual contact with other residents and did not want them unsupervised together. The facility's Director of Nursing and other staff acknowledged that required assessments, care plan updates, and staff training were not completed following the first incident, and that these failures contributed to the recurrence of nonconsensual sexual contact between the residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙