Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0801
E

Failure to Provide Timely Nutrition Assessments and Interdisciplinary Collaboration for Residents with Weight Loss

Susanville, California Survey Completed on 09-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain an adequate food and nutrition department for three residents who experienced significant weight loss. Timely nutrition assessments were not performed after weight loss triggered a change of condition for all three residents. In one case, a nutritional assessment was completed 26 days after severe weight loss was identified, while in another, the assessment was completed 46 days after the trigger. For the third resident, the assessment occurred 77 days after the weight loss was noted. These delays were contrary to the facility's policy, which required prompt nutritional assessments upon a change of condition that placed residents at risk for impaired nutrition. The Registered Dietician (RD) did not participate in weight variance interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings, nor did the RD document progress notes indicating review of IDT meeting notes. The RD stated that meeting times conflicted with other obligations and was unaware of the expectation to enter weekly progress notes for missed meetings. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator confirmed that the RD had not attended any weight meetings since starting at the facility, and no progress notes were entered for missed meetings. This lack of participation and documentation hindered the collaborative approach required for managing residents with weight loss. Communication and collaboration between the RD and the dietary department were also lacking. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) reported no direct communication with the RD regarding residents experiencing weight loss, and the RD confirmed not having spoken to the CDM. Additionally, the RD did not notify the facility of completed assessments or recommendations for the residents in question. Both the RD and the facility's Administrator were unfamiliar with the Agreement to Provide Dietetic Consultation Services contract, which outlined responsibilities such as orientation to facility policies and written notification of significant weight loss. The Administrator admitted not notifying the RD in writing about residents with significant weight loss, and the RD was unaware of the facility's policies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙