Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Intervene After Resident Meal Refusals

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 09-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate nutrition by not providing appropriate interventions when the resident refused multiple meals. The resident, who had diagnoses including diabetes, dysphagia, lack of coordination, and an above-knee amputation, was admitted with a care plan that identified a risk for nutritional problems and required a mechanical soft, carbohydrate-controlled, no added salt diet. The care plan specified that the resident should maintain adequate nutritional status by consuming at least 75% of three meals daily, and included interventions for the registered dietitian to evaluate and make dietary recommendations as needed. Despite these care plan requirements, documentation showed that the resident refused to eat dinner on one day and refused all meals on two other days. There was no evidence that the physician or registered dietitian were notified of these refusals, as required by facility policy. The DON confirmed during interview and record review that there was no documentation of such notifications, and acknowledged that the physician and RD should have been informed immediately to provide recommendations. Facility policy required notification of the physician and responsible party in cases of resident refusal of care or services, but this was not followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙