Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0693
D

Failure to Obtain Physician Orders for G-Tube Site Care

Stockton, California Survey Completed on 09-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that physician orders were in place to direct the care of gastrostomy tube (G-tube) sites for two residents who required such care. For both residents, clinical record reviews and interviews with licensed nursing staff confirmed that there were no active physician treatment orders specifying the necessary care for the G-tube sites. Staff acknowledged that facility policy required daily treatment of G-tube sites, and the absence of these orders meant that the prescribed care was not documented or provided as required. Further review of treatment administration records showed no evidence that one resident received any G-tube site care upon readmission, and the other resident lacked orders for dressing changes or site cleaning over a specified period. The Director of Sub-Acute Services confirmed that it was expected for residents with G-tubes to have physician orders detailing treatment instructions. The facility's own policy emphasized the importance of keeping the skin around the G-tube exit site clean, dry, and lubricated, but this standard was not met due to the missing orders.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙