Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Honor Resident's No Fish Dietary Preference

Newhall, California Survey Completed on 09-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression, and epilepsy was admitted to the facility with a physician order specifying a controlled carbohydrate, no added salt, regular texture, and no fish diet. Despite this order, the resident's food preference for no fish was not documented on the Diet Communication Form, and the dietary department was not informed. On the day following admission, the facility's menu included fish for lunch, and the resident was served a meal containing fish. The meal ticket on the resident's tray did not indicate the no fish preference, and staff members, including a CNA and an LVN, were unaware of the resident's dietary restriction at the time the meal was served. The deficiency was further evidenced by interviews and record reviews showing that the resident's food preference was communicated by a family member to nursing staff on the night of admission, but this information was not relayed to the dietary department or reflected in the resident's dietary documentation. The dietary supervisor only updated the Diet Communication Form after being informed of the issue by the family member. The facility's policy required that dietary profiles include diet orders and food dislikes, but this was not followed, resulting in the resident being served a meal that did not accommodate their documented preference.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙