Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
B

Failure to Develop Care Plan for Dislodged Nephrostomy Tube

Dana Point, California Survey Completed on 09-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the needs of a resident who experienced a dislodged nephrostomy tube. According to the facility's policy, a person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timetables should be developed and implemented for each resident, including after a change in condition. Medical record review showed that the resident, who had moderately impaired cognition, had a nephrostomy tube dislodged and was transferred to an acute care hospital for re-insertion. Upon return to the facility with the tube replaced, there was no evidence that a care plan was created to address the dislodged and replaced nephrostomy tube. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and the DON, confirmed that no care plan was developed for the resident's nephrostomy tube incident. The staff acknowledged that a care plan should have been initiated following the change in condition, including interventions such as transfer to the hospital and care of the nephrostomy tube site. The absence of a care plan meant the resident's specific needs related to the nephrostomy tube were not formally addressed in the care planning process.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙