Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Consistent Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Staff Training

Buena Park, California Survey Completed on 10-31-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement effective infection control practices for seven non-sampled residents who were under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) such as CRE, C. auris, and CRAB. Observations revealed that EBP signs posted outside resident rooms were inconsistent and, in some cases, incorrect. For example, one room displayed a red sign requiring staff to wear an N-95 mask for a resident with CRE, which was not necessary according to facility policy. Other rooms had both standard EBP signs and additional colored signs (red or pink), each listing different PPE requirements, leading to confusion among staff. Interviews with staff, including LVNs, CNAs, RNs, and the Infection Preventionist (IP), demonstrated a lack of understanding regarding the meaning and requirements of the different colored isolation signs. Some staff incorrectly believed that an N-95 mask was required for EBP precautions, while others could not distinguish between the red and pink signs or their associated PPE protocols. The IP confirmed that the red and pink signs were intended to indicate additional infections and PPE needs but acknowledged that the signage was not always accurate and that staff training on the distinction between the signs was insufficient. Further review of training records showed that while staff had received general in-service training on EBP precautions, there was no documentation of specific training on the differences between the red and pink isolation signs. The lack of clear, consistent signage and inadequate staff training on EBP protocols resulted in improper implementation of infection control measures for residents colonized with MDROs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙