Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0644
D

Failure to Coordinate PASRR Assessment After New Mental Health Diagnosis

Irving, Texas Survey Completed on 07-03-2025

Penalty

Fine: $17,215
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to coordinate assessments with the Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program for one resident who was reviewed for PASRR assessments. The resident, an older female with severe cognitive impairment and a BIMS score of 03, was admitted with active diagnoses of depression disorder and anxiety disorder. On a later date, she received a new diagnosis of schizophrenia, but the facility did not refer her to the appropriate state-designated mental health authority for review, nor was a new PASRR evaluation completed as required. The initial PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a mental illness, and the new diagnosis was not followed up with the necessary assessment. Interviews revealed that the DON was aware a new PASRR evaluation should have been completed after the new diagnosis, but the responsible MDS nurse was transitioning to another facility and did not follow up or inform others. The Regional MDS nurse was not aware of the new diagnosis until notified by the DON and confirmed that no new PASRR screening had been done. The facility administrator stated there was no specific PASRR policy in place, and the facility relied on state guidelines.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙