Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Resident Referred to as 'Feeder' in Assisted Dining Room

Pleasanton, Texas Survey Completed on 07-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with severe cognitive impairment, requiring assistance with activities of daily living including eating, was referred to as a "feeder" by an LVN in the assisted dining room. The resident had diagnoses of altered mental status, dysphagia, and unspecified dementia, and their care plan emphasized the importance of promoting dignity, conversing with the resident, and ensuring privacy during care. The facility's policy also required staff to treat residents with dignity and respect, specifically prohibiting labeling residents by their care needs. During an observation, the LVN was seen verifying diets and referred to the residents at the assisted dining table as "feeders." In a subsequent interview, the LVN acknowledged using a poor choice of words and stated that "assisted dining table" should have been used instead. The DON confirmed that referring to residents as "feeders" was unacceptable and not in line with facility expectations or policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙