Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Provide Comprehensive Care Plan for Cardiac Pacemaker

Pleasanton, Texas Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident with a cardiac pacemaker received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the resident’s comprehensive person-centered care plan. Record reviews showed that the resident’s diagnosis of a cardiac pacemaker was documented, but there was no physician order specifying the pacemaker’s serial number or instructions for device care. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the resident did not include care for the cardiac pacemaker, and the care plan lacked essential details such as the device’s name, serial number, and information about recent cardiac physician appointments to check the pacemaker’s status. The care plan only included instructions to report signs and symptoms to the physician immediately. Observations confirmed the presence of a cardiac pacemaker, and both the resident and nursing staff acknowledged its existence. However, during interviews, the Administrator and Director of Nursing were unable to provide information regarding a recent cardiac appointment or a policy specific to pacemaker care. The facility’s policy on comprehensive care plans requires that all services identified in the resident’s assessment be included to meet professional standards, but this was not followed for the resident with the pacemaker.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙