Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Incomplete Care Plan for Resident with Cardiac Pacemaker

Pleasanton, Texas Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident with a cardiac pacemaker. Record reviews showed that the care plan did not include essential information such as the pacemaker's name, serial number, or instructions on device care. Additionally, there was no documentation of a recent cardiac physician appointment to check the status of the pacemaker, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not address pacemaker care. The care plan only mentioned avoiding electromagnetic interference and did not specify signs and symptoms to report to the physician immediately. There was also no evidence of a scheduled cardiac physician appointment in the resident's chart. During interviews, both the resident and a registered nurse confirmed the presence of a cardiac pacemaker, but administrative staff were unable to provide information regarding the device's details or recent follow-up care. The facility's policy requires comprehensive care plans to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents' medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs, but this was not followed in the case of the resident with a pacemaker.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙