Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0644
D

Failure to Complete PASRR Reassessment for Resident with New Mental Health Diagnoses

Amarillo, Texas Survey Completed on 06-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to refer a resident with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for a Level II PASRR review upon a significant change in status assessment. Specifically, a female resident with diagnoses of bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was not reassessed with a new PASRR Level I screening, despite these qualifying diagnoses being documented after her initial admission. The original PASRR Level I assessment, completed prior to admission, indicated the resident was negative for mental illness, but subsequent records, including the MDS and care plan, reflected the presence of bipolar disorder and PTSD. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of understanding regarding the need for a new PASRR Level I assessment when a qualifying diagnosis is identified after admission. The DON, responsible for PASRR assessments, believed that a new screening was unnecessary if the diagnosis was presumed to be present prior to admission. The facility's policy on admission criteria did not address the need for re-screening based on new or newly identified qualifying diagnoses.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙