Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0803
D

Diabetic Resident Served Non-Compliant Desserts

Canoga Park, California Survey Completed on 08-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus, who was on a consistent carbohydrate/no added salt diet and required substantial assistance with daily activities, was served regular gelatin and regular pudding instead of sugar free alternatives. The resident's care plan specifically indicated the need for dietary restrictions and compliance with a nutritional regimen to manage hyperglycemia. During lunch service, the gelatin provided was unlabeled, and the pudding cup was marked with an 'R', which staff confirmed indicated regular pudding. Both a Licensed Vocational Nurse and the Registered Dietician verified that the items served were not sugar free and did not meet the dietary requirements for a diabetic resident. The facility's policy on consistent carbohydrate diets, which is intended for residents with diabetes, was not followed in this instance. The Registered Dietician stated that the resident should have received sugar free gelatin and pudding in accordance with their prescribed diet. The failure to provide the appropriate diet was observed during meal service and confirmed through interviews and record review, demonstrating noncompliance with the resident's care plan and facility dietary policies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙