Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Honor Resident Food Preferences During Meal Service

Indio, California Survey Completed on 06-26-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor the documented food preferences of two residents during a lunch meal service. One resident, who had a documented dislike of pork on his meal ticket, was observed eating a substitute burrito after being served a main entrée containing pork. The resident stated he disliked pork and frequently received it despite his preference being noted. Review of his record showed he was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including end-stage renal disease and diabetes. An LVN confirmed that pork should not have been served, and the kitchen staff should have followed the diet slip instructions. Another resident, also with a documented dislike of pork and a history of dysphagia, was observed eating a meal that included chopped pork. The resident consumed only a few bites of the pork and stated a dislike for it. Both residents' meal tickets clearly indicated their dislike for pork, and the facility's policy required adherence to food preferences and provision of alternate menu items as dictated by resident dislikes. The Registered Dietician confirmed that residents' preferences and dislikes are to be printed on meal tickets to guide dietary staff, and that the residents should not have been served pork.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙