Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
E

Failure to Follow Protocols for Use of Physical Restraints

Studio City, California Survey Completed on 06-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that three residents were free from the use of physical restraints without proper procedures, including obtaining a physician's order, informed consent, and conducting a restraint assessment. For one resident with a history of falls, impaired cognition, and limited mobility, the bed was placed against the wall, restricting bed exit and entry to one side. There was no physician's order, informed consent from the resident or representative, restraint assessment, or care plan for this intervention, despite the resident's inability to make decisions and high risk for falls. Two other residents, both with significant cognitive impairment and high fall risk, had pad/tab alarms applied to their beds. These alarms, considered restraints by facility staff and policy, were used to alert staff when the residents attempted to get out of bed. In both cases, there was no physician's order, no informed consent, no restraint assessment, and no care plan developed prior to the application of the alarms. Staff interviews confirmed that these steps were not taken and acknowledged the alarms' restrictive nature. The facility's own policy requires a physician's order, informed consent, and a restraint assessment before applying any restraint, as well as the development of a care plan addressing the use and reduction of restraints. Despite these requirements, the necessary documentation and assessments were not completed for the residents in question, resulting in the use of restraints without adherence to established protocols.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙