Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
E

Failure to Follow Bed Rail and Restraint Policies for Multiple Residents

El Monte, California Survey Completed on 06-27-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its own policies and procedures regarding the use of bed rails and physical restraints for four residents. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment and total dependence for activities of daily living, staff installed bilateral upper half side rails without obtaining informed consent from the resident or their responsible party. Both the LVN and DON confirmed that no signed informed consent was present in the resident's chart or electronic medical record, despite facility policy requiring this before side rail use. Another resident, who was cognitively intact and independent in bed mobility, had bilateral side rails with damaged and ripped padding. The resident stated they did not use or want the side rails, and there was no documentation that alternative interventions had been attempted prior to their use. The DON acknowledged the lack of clinical documentation for attempted alternatives and agreed that the damaged padding should have been replaced to ensure safety and dignity, as required by facility policy. Two additional residents with seizure disorders and physician orders for padded side rails were observed to have bedside rails without any foam padding. Both residents had documented cognitive impairment and active orders for padded rails as a safety precaution. Staff interviews confirmed that the required padding was not present, and the DON stated that padding was necessary to prevent injury during seizures. Facility policy specified that side rails should be padded if ordered by a physician for seizure management.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙