Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Readmit Resident After Hospital Clearance

Stockton, California Survey Completed on 06-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident, who had diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness and paraplegia, was readmitted after being cleared for return from a general acute care hospital. The resident had left the facility without notifying staff, returned the same day, and was subsequently sent to the hospital due to alcohol intoxication. Despite being cleared by the hospital for return, the facility denied readmission, citing the resident's altered mental status and considering the situation as an 'Against Medical Advice' (AMA) discharge, even though the resident did not sign an AMA form. Interviews with facility staff revealed inconsistent application of AMA procedures and a lack of clear documentation regarding the resident's discharge status. The resident remained at the hospital after being denied readmission, resulting in a temporary loss of residence and reported emotional distress. Facility records and staff interviews confirmed that the discharge was initiated by the facility after the resident returned intoxicated, and that the facility's policy allows for return after emergency hospital transfers unless a facility-initiated discharge is warranted. The facility's actions did not align with their own policy, as the resident was not permitted to return despite being cleared by the hospital and not having formally left AMA.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙