Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
D

Failure to Assess Capacity and Protect Residents from Potential Sexual Abuse

Milwaukee, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 06-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to protect two residents from potential abuse when they were observed engaging in physical intimacy, including holding hands, kissing, and inappropriate touching, without documented assessment of their capacity to consent. Both residents had significant cognitive impairments, as evidenced by low or incomplete BIMS scores, and both had histories of behavioral issues, including sexual inappropriateness and wandering. Despite these factors, the facility did not complete or have a policy for assessing capacity to consent to sexual intimacy for either resident. Staff members observed the two residents engaging in intimate behaviors in a public area, with multiple staff confirming the incident and reporting it to supervisory staff. The care plans for both residents did not address sexual inappropriateness or include behavior monitoring, despite documented histories of such behaviors. The facility's abuse prevention policy required investigation of sexual activity involving residents with cognitive impairment, but this was not followed as required assessments were not completed. Interviews with staff revealed that the incident was witnessed by several employees, who noted the residents' prior behavioral histories and reported the event to the appropriate personnel. However, there was a lack of timely intervention and documentation regarding the residents' ability to consent, and the care plans were not updated to reflect the risk or address the behaviors observed. The facility also lacked a specific policy on assessing capacity to consent for sexual intimacy, contributing to the failure to protect the residents from potential abuse.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙