Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0883
E

Failure to Screen, Document, and Obtain Informed Consent for Vaccinations

Pt Orchard, Washington Survey Completed on 04-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were properly screened and provided with informed consent for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. For five residents reviewed, there were multiple instances where either the risk and benefits of the vaccines were not documented, the required Vaccine Information Sheet (VIS) was not provided, or the vaccines were not offered or administered according to protocol. In several cases, consent for vaccination was obtained, but there was no documentation that the risks and benefits were reviewed with the resident or their representative. In one instance, a resident's refusal of the influenza vaccine was documented, but there was no evidence that the risks and benefits of refusal were discussed. Another resident had not been offered either the influenza or pneumococcal vaccine since admission, and their vaccination status had not been reviewed as part of the admission process. Staff interviews confirmed these deficiencies, with the Infection Preventionist and Director of Nursing Services acknowledging that the review of risks, benefits, and provision of VIS were not consistently documented or completed for every vaccine administration. The Director of Nursing Services also confirmed that it did not meet expectations for residents' vaccination status to go unreviewed or for vaccines not to be offered as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙