Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Care Plans for Resident Safety and Activity Preferences

Seattle, Washington Survey Completed on 05-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to revise and update comprehensive care plans for two residents as required. For one resident, repeated refusals to wear a safety apron while smoking were observed and documented by staff, but this behavior was not reflected in the resident's care plan. Staff interviews confirmed that the refusal was ongoing and known to the care team, yet the care plan was not updated to address this behavior, despite expectations from nursing leadership that it should have been included. For another resident, the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified specific activity preferences, including being around animals, doing favorite activities, and going outside for fresh air. These preferences were marked as very important by the resident's representative. However, a review of the resident's activity care plan showed that these preferences were not incorporated. Staff involved in care planning acknowledged that the care plan did not reflect the resident's identified interests, and facility leadership confirmed that such preferences should be included.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙