Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Edema Management Care Plans and Monitoring

Spokane, Washington Survey Completed on 07-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement care plan goals and interventions for two residents with edema, as well as to monitor their condition as required. One resident, who had diagnoses including lymphedema and osteomyelitis, was admitted with significant lower leg edema and a surgical incision on the left heel. The care plan addressed skin impairment and general skin care but did not include specific interventions or monitoring for lymphedema or lower leg edema. Although an order was given for Tubi-grips to manage edema, the resident consistently refused them, and no alternative interventions or monitoring were documented. Observations showed persistent edema and discoloration, and the resident reported a lack of other measures to address swelling. Another resident, admitted with high blood pressure and irregular heartbeat, also exhibited lower extremity edema. This resident had received Lasix, which was later discontinued with instructions for monitoring blood pressure and fluid status, but documentation showed only one progress note during the monitoring period and no evidence of edema monitoring in the medication administration records. The care plan did not address the resident's edema, and repeated observations showed ongoing swelling, redness, and fluid leakage from the legs. Staff interviews confirmed that interventions such as compression stockings, elevation, and monitoring should have been in place, but these were not documented or observed. The Director of Nursing and other staff acknowledged that care plans and monitoring for edema were lacking for both residents. The facility did not have a specific policy for lymphedema and edema management, relying instead on standard practices. The absence of individualized care planning and monitoring for edema in these cases constituted a failure to provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident preferences, and goals.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙