Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0645
D

Failure to Accurately Complete PASARR Screening and Referral

Lynnwood, Washington Survey Completed on 07-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I form was completed accurately and that a Level II PASARR referral was made for a resident with a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Specifically, the resident was admitted with a diagnosis that included anxiety disorder, but this diagnosis was not marked in Section IA (Serious Mental Illness) of the Level I PASARR form. As a result, Section IV of the form indicated that no Level II evaluation was needed, contrary to the resident's documented medical condition. During a joint record review and interview, it was confirmed that the resident's diagnosis of anxiety disorder was present in their medical records but was omitted from the PASARR Level I form. Staff involved acknowledged that the diagnosis should have been included and that a Level II referral should have been made. The facility's administrator also stated that the PASARR form should accurately reflect all SMI diagnoses, but was unsure about the specific criteria for Level II referrals.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙