Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0583
D

Failure to Ensure Privacy During Provider Visits

Seattle, Washington Survey Completed on 06-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of medical information during provider visits for two residents. Observations showed that an Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) conducted medical discussions with one resident in the Memory Care Unit (MCU) TV room, a common area where other residents were present. The ARNP discussed specific medical conditions and laboratory results with the resident in this public setting. Staff interviews confirmed that the visit occurred in a common area and that privacy was not provided, contrary to facility expectations. A second resident was seen by the same ARNP while seated on a bench between the MCU nurse's station and dining room, another public area. The ARNP asked about specific medical conditions and attempted a physical assessment in this location. Staff interviews again confirmed that the visit was not conducted in private and that the expectation was for such visits to occur in a private setting. The Director of Nursing also acknowledged that provider visits should be conducted privately.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙