Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0698
D

Inaccurate Dialysis Documentation and Care Planning

Monroe, Washington Survey Completed on 05-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide consistent, complete, and accurate assessments for a resident receiving hemodialysis, as evidenced by discrepancies in documentation and care planning. Specifically, the dialysis communication forms completed by licensed nurses repeatedly documented the presence of bruit and thrill, which are indicators associated with a fistula, despite the resident having a right femoral tunneled catheter line and not a fistula. Interviews with staff revealed confusion regarding the type and location of the resident's dialysis access site, with some staff incorrectly identifying it as a port or an upper chest central line, while the actual site was a right femoral tunneled catheter. The care plan also inaccurately described the access site, and staff relied on incorrect information from the communication board and provider orders. The resident, admitted with end stage renal disease and receiving regular hemodialysis, had their access site managed exclusively by the dialysis center, with facility staff only reinforcing the dressing. Despite this, the facility's documentation and care planning did not accurately reflect the resident's current access site or the appropriate assessments, leading to inconsistent communication between the facility and the dialysis center. These documentation errors and lack of accurate care planning were confirmed through interviews and record reviews, highlighting a failure to ensure safe and appropriate dialysis care and services for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙