Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0760
E

Failure to Adhere to Medication Administration Parameters and Documentation

Coupeville, Washington Survey Completed on 07-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors, as evidenced by multiple instances where medications were administered outside of physician-ordered parameters or without proper documentation. For several residents with diagnoses such as hypertension, heart failure, and autonomic nervous system disorders, medications including Metoprolol, Digoxin, Lisinopril, Amlodipine, Losartan Potassium, and Propranolol were either given when vital signs were below the required thresholds or held without appropriate documentation of the reason. In some cases, vital signs were not taken as required before or after medication administration, and there was a lack of documentation in the medical records or progress notes to justify these actions. For example, one resident received Metoprolol despite a systolic blood pressure (SBP) below the ordered parameter, while another received Lisinopril and Metoprolol when their SBP was below the physician's specified threshold. In another case, a resident was given Amlodipine and Losartan Potassium outside the ordered SBP parameters. Additionally, there were instances where PRN Propranolol was administered without clear documentation of whether vital signs were taken before and after administration, as required by the provider's order. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing Services confirmed that the expectation was for nurses to follow medication parameters and document vital signs accordingly. However, the facility's state reporting log did not reflect that these medication errors had been identified, and staff acknowledged that audits of medications with parameters were not routinely conducted. The lack of adherence to physician orders and incomplete documentation contributed to the identified deficiencies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙