Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Document and Provide Evidence of Therapeutic Diet Delivery

Rural Retreat, Virginia Survey Completed on 04-08-2025

Penalty

Fine: $135,372
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide evidence that a resident with multiple complex medical diagnoses, including atrial fibrillation, dementia, heart failure, and a history of falls, received or refused a therapeutic diet as ordered by the medical provider during several evening meals. The resident was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired and had a care plan in place to provide and monitor a regular diet, with intake to be recorded at each meal. However, meal intake records for specific dates showed no documentation of meal percentages consumed or refusals for the evening meals in question. Interviews with staff and the local ombudsman did not yield direct observations of the resident missing meals, and staff recalled the resident typically ate independently after tray setup, preferring finger foods. Despite this, the facility was unable to provide documentation for meal delivery or refusals on the specified dates, except for one instance where partial intake was recorded. The facility's policy required encouragement of resident participation in meals, but no further information was provided to demonstrate compliance with ordered dietary interventions during the identified periods.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙