Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0757
D

Failure to Adhere to Physician-Ordered Parameters for Antihypertensive Medication

Bowling Green, Virginia Survey Completed on 05-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to ensure that a resident’s drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications by not adhering to physician-ordered parameters for administering hydralazine, an antihypertensive medication. The physician’s order specified that hydralazine should be held if the resident’s systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 140. Despite this, the medication administration record (MAR) showed that the resident received hydralazine on three occasions when their SBP was below the prescribed threshold (134, 137, and 138). These administrations were documented with check marks on the MAR, indicating the medication was given outside of the ordered parameters. A nurse’s note confirmed that the medication was administered outside of the prescribed parameters and that the nurse practitioner and responsible party were made aware. During an interview, an LPN acknowledged that the medication should not have been given on those dates, as the nurses did not pay attention to the physician’s hold parameter. The facility’s policy requires medications to be administered in accordance with prescriber orders, but this was not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙