Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Update Care Plan with Resident's Caregiver Preference

Appomattox, Virginia Survey Completed on 08-13-2025

Penalty

Fine: $28,670
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of six residents in the survey sample. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, anemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, asthma, cognitive communication deficit, hypothyroidism, myocardial infarction, and hypertension, and was assessed as having severely impaired cognitive skills. A nursing note documented that a family member requested the resident not have male caregivers if possible. However, the care plan, last revised on 7/21/25, did not include this preference. During an interview, the RN MDS coordinator confirmed that the preference was not documented in the care plan, although staff were aware of it. No additional information was provided by the facility prior to the end of the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙