Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0637
D

Failure to Identify and Assess Significant Weight Loss

Roanoke, Virginia Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to accurately identify and assess a significant change in a resident's physical condition using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process. Specifically, a resident with multiple diagnoses, including osteoarthritis, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and a history of digestive system surgery, experienced a 6.1% weight loss over thirty days. Despite this, the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment did not reflect the significant weight loss, as Section K0300 was coded to indicate no weight loss of 5% or more in the last month. A nurse's progress note documented the significant weight loss, but this information was not incorporated into the MDS assessment. During a staff interview, an LPN acknowledged that the MDS should have been coded as a significant change assessment due to the unplanned weight loss and that the weight loss should have been recorded. The deficiency was identified through clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, and was discussed with facility leadership prior to survey exit.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙