Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Address Repeated Refusals of Care in Comprehensive Care Plan

Fort Worth, Texas Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident with multiple medical diagnoses, including Multiple Sclerosis, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and a history of Transient Ischemic Attack. Despite the resident's moderate cognitive impairment and repeated refusals of essential care and services such as wound care, perineal care, medication administration, showers, and nutritional supplements, the care plan did not include any interventions to address these refusals. Documentation in the resident's progress notes showed numerous instances where the resident declined wound debridement, application of prescribed creams, blood sugar checks, and other necessary treatments over an extended period. Interviews with the DON and Administrator confirmed that the resident's refusals should have been addressed in the care plan, with specific interventions to encourage acceptance of care. The facility's own policy required that the care plan identify declined care, the associated risks, and efforts by the interdisciplinary team to educate the resident and seek alternative solutions. However, the care plan lacked these elements, resulting in a failure to meet the resident's identified needs as outlined in the comprehensive assessment.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙