Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Implement Physician-Ordered Contact Isolation Precautions

Savannah, Tennessee Survey Completed on 06-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow a physician's order for contact isolation precautions for a resident diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL), a bacteria resistant to many antibiotics. According to the facility's infection control policy, residents with infections are to be placed under appropriate isolation precautions. The resident in question had a physician's order specifically for contact isolation due to the ESBL UTI. Despite this order, observations on multiple occasions revealed that the signage on the resident's door indicated enhanced barrier precautions rather than contact isolation. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) and the Director of Nurses confirmed that the resident was supposed to be in contact isolation, and both acknowledged that the room signage was incorrect at the time of the observations. The discrepancy between the physician's order and the implemented precautions constituted a failure to follow prescribed infection control measures.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙