Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate and Incomplete MDS Assessments

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate and fully completed for six out of fifteen residents. According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, specific sections of the MDS, such as Section C (Cognitive Patterns) and Section D (Mood), require completion of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and Resident Mood Interview if the resident is at least sometimes understood. However, for the identified residents, there were inconsistencies between their ability to be understood as documented in Section B (Hearing, Speech, and Vision) and the coding in Sections C and D, resulting in the required assessments not being completed. For example, several residents were documented as being 'usually' or 'sometimes' understood in Section B, but were coded as 'rarely understood' in Sections C and D, leading to the omission of the BIMS and Mood Interview assessments. This discrepancy was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the facility did not ensure the accuracy and completeness of the MDS assessments for these residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙