Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Inconsistent Advance Directive and POLST Documentation

Franklin, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 08-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's physician orders and Pennsylvania Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) were consistent, as required by facility policy and state regulations. The resident in question had multiple documents in their clinical record, including a Living Will indicating Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status and a POLST indicating Full Code status. Physician orders in the record were conflicting, with some indicating Full Code and others indicating DNR. Progress notes from both social services and nursing documented changes in the resident's code status, but the most recent POLST available in the unit binder and on the nurse report sheet still indicated Full Code, while physician orders indicated DNR. Interviews with an LPN confirmed that the documentation in the binder and on the nurse report sheet did not match the most current physician orders. The LPN acknowledged that the most recent POLST, signed by the resident and physician, indicated Full Code, while the physician's orders indicated DNR. This inconsistency between the resident's advance directives, POLST, and physician orders resulted in a failure to honor the resident's documented treatment preferences as required by policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙