Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
D

Failure to Ensure Resident Capacity and Choice in Arbitration Agreement

Sewickley, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 07-31-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement prior to signing. Review of clinical records showed that the resident had a diagnosis of dementia and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Despite this, the resident personally signed the binding arbitration agreement at admission. The agreement was labeled as 'Mandatory Arbitration Agreement' and did not provide an option for the resident or their representative to decline or refuse to sign. Interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that all new admissions were required to sign the arbitration agreement as part of the admission packet, and the NHA was unable to explain what would happen if a resident chose not to sign. The NHA acknowledged that the process did not allow for resident choice and confirmed the failure to ensure the resident's capacity to understand the agreement. The deficiency was cited under 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a)(c) and 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(e)(1).

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙