Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Assess Bed Bolsters as Potential Restraints

Coraopolis, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 09-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to properly identify and assess the use of bed bolsters as potential physical restraints for two residents. According to facility policy, any device that restricts a resident's freedom of movement and cannot be easily removed by the resident should be evaluated as a possible restraint. For one resident with diagnoses including high blood pressure, Friedreich ataxia, and malnutrition, bolsters were observed on both sides of the bed, but there was no physician order for their use and no assessment or ongoing evaluation documented in the clinical record. The care plan noted a history of falls and included bolsters as an intervention, but did not address their use as a restraint. For another resident with high blood pressure, dementia, and arthritis, bolsters were also observed on both sides of the bed. While there was a physician order and care plan intervention for bolsters due to fall risk, the clinical record lacked any assessment or ongoing evaluation regarding their use as a restraint. During staff interviews, the DON confirmed that the facility did not identify bolsters as possible restraints and did not assess the residents' functional status to determine if the bolsters restricted their freedom of movement.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙