Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Update Care Plans Following Changes in Resident Needs

Indiana, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated or revised to reflect the current care needs of two residents. For one resident with muscular dystrophy and limited lower extremity range of motion, the care plan included the use of bilateral PRAFO boots with specific instructions for their application and removal. However, multiple observations revealed that the resident was not wearing the boots, and both the resident and therapy manager confirmed that the boots had been discontinued about one to two months prior due to discomfort and the resident's refusal to wear them. Despite this, the care plan was not revised to reflect the discontinuation of the PRAFO boots. For another resident who was cognitively intact and required maximum assistance for care, the care plan indicated frequent urinary tract infections and directed staff to monitor and record urinary output. Nursing documentation showed that the resident's indwelling urinary catheter had been removed and that she was now incontinent of urine. There was no evidence that the care plan was updated to reflect the change in urinary status or to revise interventions accordingly. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plan should not have included instructions to monitor urine output after the catheter was removed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙