Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Inconsistent Advance Directive Documentation for Two Residents

Emporium, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents' wishes regarding advance directives were clearly established and consistently reflected in both the physical and electronic medical records for two of four residents reviewed. For one resident, the physical chart contained a POLST form signed by both the physician and the resident, indicating a desire for CPR but a refusal of intubation (DNI). However, the electronic medical record and active physician orders instructed staff to implement Full Code treatment without any restriction on intubation. Staff interviews confirmed that in the event of a medical emergency, they would follow the electronic orders, which did not reflect the resident's DNI preference. Similarly, another resident's physical chart included documentation that a POLST was completed with the resident and her son, designating CPR with limited interventions and a DNI order. The POLST was signed by the physician and the resident's responsible party. Despite this, the electronic medical record and active physician orders indicated Full Code treatment without any restriction on intubation. Staff confirmed that, based on the electronic orders and absence of a physical chart indicator, they would provide Full Code CPR without honoring the DNI preference. These discrepancies were reviewed with facility leadership during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙