Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Provide Required Supervision for Aspiration Precautions

Portland, Oregon Survey Completed on 07-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement care plan interventions for aspiration precautions for a resident with chronic respiratory failure and congestive heart failure. The resident's care plan required one-to-one supervision during all meals due to aspiration risk. On one occasion, the resident was found alone in their room with a partially eaten meal tray and no staff present, despite calling out for assistance. The speech therapist later confirmed the resident should have been under one-to-one supervision while eating and observed the meal tray unattended. The assigned CNA was unaware of the resident's need for supervised eating and stated it was their first shift working with the resident. The RCM also confirmed the resident's requirement for aspiration precautions and one-to-one supervision during meals.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙