Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0881
D

Failure to Utilize Infection Assessment Screening for Antibiotic Stewardship

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 05-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to utilize an infection assessment screening to determine the necessity of antibiotic use for two of five sampled residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. According to the infection prevention and control program policy, an antibiotic stewardship program, including protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use, was to be implemented. However, record review showed that one resident received zithromax for an upper respiratory infection and another received azithromycin and later doxycycline for a skin infection, with no laboratory results or infection assessment screenings documented in their clinical records for these antibiotic treatments. Interviews with the DON and director of clinical services revealed that the facility claimed to use the McGreer and Loeb screening tools for antibiotic stewardship, with infection screening evaluations supposedly located under assessments in the clinical record. Despite these claims, the last documented infection screening evaluation for one resident was several months prior to the antibiotic administration, and no screening tools were found for the relevant infection episodes. The DON confirmed that antibiotic appropriateness was determined based on physician orders, but there was no evidence of the required infection assessment screenings being completed at the time antibiotics were prescribed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙