Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Honor Resident's Right to Dietary Choice

Jenks, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 06-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's right to make choices regarding their diet. A resident with a history of stroke and aphasia, but with intact cognition, was observed consuming soda in their room and reported dissatisfaction with being placed on a soft diet with thickened liquids. The resident stated they had not experienced choking and had not undergone a swallow evaluation at the facility, being told by staff that insurance would not cover it. The resident also reported consuming regular food brought by friends and had previously eaten a regular diet at home and upon initial admission. Facility staff, including the ADON, social services director, and administrator, were unable to clearly identify the origin of the soft diet order, with some suggesting it may have been a transcription error or related to a previous hospice waiver. The medical director believed the order was due to a stroke and possible dysphagia, but there was no documented diagnosis of dysphagia or incidents of choking. The facility did not offer waivers for diet preferences outside of hospice care, and staff indicated they would not question the physician's order or seek justification, resulting in the resident's dietary preferences not being honored.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙