Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
D

Failure to Implement Physician-Ordered Palm Protector for Resident with Limited Mobility

Canton, Ohio Survey Completed on 06-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure that a resident's left palm protector was implemented as ordered to prevent skin breakdown and deformity. The resident, who had a history of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, muscle weakness, and vascular dementia, had a physician's order for a left palm protector to be applied in the morning and removed at bedtime, with skin integrity checks twice daily. Documentation in the medical record indicated the palm protector was applied as ordered, and the care plan included this intervention. However, during observation, the resident was found with a contracted left hand and no palm protector in place, and the resident confirmed that the device was supposed to be worn during the day. A CNA also confirmed the palm protector was not in place as ordered and applied it at that time. Further interviews revealed that staff were not consistently aware of the timing for removal of the palm protector, with one CNA stating she was unaware it was to be removed at bedtime. Additionally, the facility did not have a policy regarding the use of palm protectors.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙