Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0695
G

Failure to Ensure BiPAP Orders and Implementation After Hospitalization

Cridersville, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-20-2025

Penalty

Fine: $26,685
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure that a BiPAP order was in place and implemented for a resident with a history of acute and chronic respiratory failure, COPD, and hypercapnia after returning from the hospital. The resident's care plan and hospital discharge orders specified the need for BiPAP therapy with specific settings, but upon review, there was no current physician's order for BiPAP, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not reflect any BiPAP orders or documentation of its use for the relevant months. Staff interviews confirmed the absence of orders and documentation, and there was no record of resident refusals or consistent application of the BiPAP therapy as prescribed. The resident experienced episodes of respiratory distress, including an incident where she was found with an oxygen saturation of 38% and required emergency transfer to the hospital, where she was intubated for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Documentation from the BiPAP machine indicated several nights when the resident did not use the device, but there was no documentation explaining these gaps or indicating whether the resident refused therapy. Staff, including the DON and Respiratory Supervisor, were unable to provide evidence that the BiPAP was consistently applied or that refusals were documented. The lack of a current physician's order, absence of documentation in the MAR and progress notes, and failure to clarify or implement the recommended BiPAP settings after hospital discharge directly contributed to the resident's respiratory compromise and subsequent hospitalization. The deficiency affected one resident out of three reviewed for oxygen therapy in a facility with a census of 40.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙