Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Administer Ordered Pressure Ulcer Care Due to Lack of Supplies

Louisville, Ohio Survey Completed on 07-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, cellulitis of both lower limbs, and chronic pain did not receive pressure ulcer care as ordered by the physician. The resident's care plan required wound treatments to the left medial ankle, posterior Achilles, and bilateral heels, including the use of normal saline, iodoform, betadine, and xeroform dressings. Documentation revealed that on specific dates, wound care was not administered as ordered: the wound care was placed on hold without physician authorization, and betadine was not available for use on the resident's heels. Observations confirmed that dressings were not changed as scheduled, and betadine was not applied during wound care treatments. Further review and interviews established that the facility had run out of betadine, and the DON confirmed that the resident had not received the prescribed wound care. There was no evidence in the medical record that the physician had ordered wound care to be held. The facility's policy required identification of residents at risk for pressure injuries and provision of care for existing wounds, but these interventions were not followed for this resident, resulting in a failure to provide pressure ulcer care as ordered.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙