Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0627
D

Failure to Permit Resident Return After Hospitalization

Rittman, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-27-2025

Penalty

32 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with multiple diagnoses, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, opioid dependence, anxiety disorder, hypertension, depression, and a history of alleged adult physical abuse, was admitted to the facility and later issued a 30-day discharge notice due to noncompliance with facility rules and a behavior contract. Despite the notice, the resident remained in the facility past the stated discharge date. The resident exhibited behavioral symptoms, including verbal outbursts and threats toward staff and other residents, and was involved in incidents that required police intervention. The facility's records show that the resident was sent to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation following an escalation in behaviors, including possession of alcohol and threats, but there were no documented attempts to facilitate the resident's return to the facility after hospitalization. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the decision not to permit the resident's return was made by facility leadership, despite awareness of the requirement to allow the resident to return after an acute care stay. The resident was ultimately discharged from the hospital to a homeless shelter, and the facility delivered his belongings there. The facility's own policy stated that residents transferred to acute care should be permitted to return upon discharge unless specific exemptions applied, but there was no documentation that these exemptions were met or that a safe discharge plan was ensured.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙