Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0688
D

Failure to Implement and Document Restorative ROM and Splinting Programs

Youngstown, Ohio Survey Completed on 06-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that passive range of motion (PROM) and splinting restorative programs were completed according to therapy recommendations for two residents with impaired range of motion. For one resident with hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and contractures in both hands and wrists, occupational therapy recommended a restorative PROM program and a splint-wearing schedule upon discharge from therapy. However, there were no physician orders or documentation for restorative ROM or splints, and the care plan did not address contractures, PROM, or splinting. Multiple observations confirmed that the resident's hands remained in a contracted position without splints, and interviews with therapy and nursing staff verified that the recommended restorative program and splinting had not been implemented since therapy discharge. Another resident with a history of cerebral infarction, muscle wasting, and contractures was also identified as requiring a PROM restorative program and a splinting program for contracture prevention. The care plan and therapy discharge summary recommended a restorative PROM program and daily use of hand and elbow splints. However, electronic records showed inconsistent documentation of splint application, with several days lacking any record of the splint being applied or refused. Interviews with staff revealed that the facility had recently shifted responsibility for restorative programs from dedicated restorative CNAs to floor CNAs, resulting in issues with program completion and documentation. The facility's policy required that residents at risk for functional limitations receive active or passive ROM to prevent further decline and that staff document all activities, participation, and refusals. Despite these requirements, both residents did not consistently receive the recommended restorative interventions, and documentation was incomplete or missing, leading to a failure to maintain or improve their range of motion as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙