Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Attempt Alternatives Prior to Bed Rail Installation

Pinehurst, North Carolina Survey Completed on 06-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to attempt alternative interventions prior to the installation of side rails for two residents who were assessed for side rail use. Both residents had a history of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke, resulting in significant physical impairment and severe cognitive impairment. Documentation for both residents included a Device and Bed Rail Review, but these assessments did not include any questions or evidence regarding the use of alternatives before side rails were implemented. Care plans for both residents focused on the use of quarter length side rails to enable bed mobility and noted the increased risk for complications, but did not document any trial of less restrictive measures. Observations confirmed that both residents were using side rails during the survey period. Interviews with the nurse responsible for the assessments, as well as with the DON and Administrator, revealed that alternative interventions were not attempted prior to the installation of side rails. Staff indicated they were unaware that trying alternatives was a requirement before implementing side rails for these residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙