Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0573
D

Delayed Provision of Medical Records to Residents and Representatives

Piscataway, New Jersey Survey Completed on 08-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide timely access to medical records for residents or their legal representatives, as required by its own policy. The policy specified that access to view documents must be provided within 24 hours of a request, and copies must be provided within two working days. For three sampled residents, multiple requests for medical records were either delayed or not fulfilled within the required timeframe. In one case, a legal representative made several requests for records, but the facility had not received or processed these requests for specific dates. In another instance, a family member submitted both in-person and certified requests for records, but did not receive the requested information. For a third resident, multiple requests were made over several months, and the records were not provided until several months after the initial requests. Interviews with facility staff revealed that changes in the process for handling medical record requests, such as forwarding requests to a paralegal, may have contributed to the delays. Staff confirmed receipt of some records but acknowledged that requests for certain dates had not been fulfilled. Documentation and correspondence reviewed during the survey supported the findings that the facility did not meet its policy requirements for timely provision of medical records to residents or their legal representatives.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙